Contact Us
How We Engage A fixed-scope Release Confidence Sprint

Ship one safer, faster product flow in 14 calendar days.

A senior AQA team works inside one agreed business-critical flow to expose release risk, implement the highest-leverage QA improvements, and leave your team with usable evidence and client-owned assets.

Book a Fit Call See What AQA Builds

Pilot scope at a glance

Leave Day 14 with stronger protection and a clear next move.

Duration
14 calendar days
Scope
One agreed business-critical product flow
Outcome
Working QA improvements backed by reviewable evidence
Ownership
AQA-created pilot assets stay with your team

Independent review profiles

Independent evidence, clearly linked to its source.

What changes

Turn release uncertainty into evidence your team can act on.

The pilot focuses on one critical flow so implementation and evidence arrive inside the same 14-day scope.

Today

Critical user journeys exist mostly in team memory.

Day 14

The agreed flow is mapped, risk-ranked, and connected to explicit test evidence.

Today

Coverage volume is visible, but business protection is unclear.

Day 14

Coverage priorities are tied to user, revenue, trust, and operational impact.

Today

Automation may be brittle, slow, or disconnected from release decisions.

Day 14

The highest-leverage checks are implemented or scoped with clear ownership and run guidance.

Today

AI use is informal, inconsistent, or difficult to review.

Day 14

AI-assisted work has approved context, human review, and source-linked evidence.

Today

Leadership lacks a clean basis for the next QA investment.

Day 14

Leaders receive a practical continue, extend, or stop recommendation grounded in observed work.

Connected delivery model

4 capabilities

One connected delivery model.
Leadership. AI QA Enablement. Automation Engineering. Continuous QA Delivery.

Four capabilities, applied according to the agreed scope.

Risk, architecture, implementation, and evidence stay connected. Scope-dependent work is selected for leverage rather than forced into every pilot.

  1. Risk and direction

    QA Leadership

    A QA Architect and QA Lead set the risk boundary, success signal, delivery priorities, and evidence standard.

    Core Included in every pilot

  2. Human-governed leverage

    AI QA Enablement

    Client-approved models can accelerate context analysis, scenario design, maintenance, and evidence preparation under human review.

    Scoped Applied when justified by the agreed flow

  3. Working protection

    Automation Engineering

    The team can implement or harden high-value API, browser, mobile, integration, or performance checks when the selected flow justifies them.

    Scoped Applied when justified by the agreed flow

  4. Delivery integration

    Continuous QA Delivery

    Useful checks can be connected to existing CI/CD, reporting, triage, and release decision paths within the access and time boundary.

    Scoped Applied when justified by the agreed flow

Context to evidence

A human-governed workflow from product intent to release signal.

Each stage remains visible and reviewable. AI assists where approved; accountable people make scope, implementation, and release judgments.

  1. Stage : 1

    Understand

    Core

    Fix the context first—or automate the wrong thing faster.

    AQA maps the one critical flow against approved requirements, designs, tickets, repositories, existing tests, incidents, business rules, integrations, and release history. AI helps connect scattered evidence; accountable QA practitioners confirm what is current, what is missing, and what can actually hurt the release.

    Managed activities
    • Critical-flow context assembly
    • Requirements, design, and architecture review
    • Change and dependency impact analysis
    • Known-risk and quality-signal review
    Outputs
    • One reviewable product and quality context map
    • Affected actors, rules, services, integrations, and data
    • Missing-context questions with named owners
    • Risk-ranked brief with source-linked assumptions

    Human controlAI can connect clues quickly. AQA decides which clues are true, which risks matter, and what stays inside the 14-day boundary.

    Core scopeIncluded in every pilot

  2. Stage : 2

    Design

    Core

    Protect the failures that cost you—not every scenario you can imagine.

    AQA turns the selected flow into a risk-ranked validation strategy across happy paths, boundaries, permissions, state changes, integrations, recovery, data, and negative behavior. The goal is not a bigger test-case count. It is a smaller set of checks with a clear reason to exist and an agreed place to run.

    Managed activities
    • Risk-based scenario design
    • Acceptance-criteria and business-rule challenge
    • Validation-layer and test-data selection
    • Coverage-gap and automation-candidate review
    Outputs
    • Prioritized scenarios with expected outcomes
    • Exploratory charters for uncertain behavior
    • Required personas, data, environments, and states
    • Agreed implementation plan for the highest-value checks

    Human controlAI can multiply scenarios. AQA removes the noise, defines the test oracle, and approves only the coverage worth building and maintaining.

    Core scopeIncluded in every pilot

  3. Stage : 3

    Build

    Scoped

    Turn the best idea into working protection inside your stack.

    When implementation is included in scope, AQA builds or hardens the checks, fixtures, configurations, workflows, and quality controls that create the most leverage for the selected flow. AI accelerates repetitive work; the QA Architect chooses the layer, pattern, assertions, and ownership model.

    Managed activities
    • API, browser, mobile, integration, or performance implementation as scoped
    • Reusable fixture and test-data setup
    • Assertion, failure-message, and reliability review
    • Repository and delivery-workflow integration
    Outputs
    • Working client-owned checks or quality controls
    • Reusable components, fixtures, and configuration
    • Layer-appropriate assertions and failure evidence
    • Documented implementation decisions and constraints

    Human controlAI can draft code. AQA reviews the architecture, proves deterministic behavior, and rejects checks that create activity without confidence.

    Scoped scopeApplied when justified by the agreed flow

  4. Stage : 4

    Run

    Scoped

    Run what matters. Return evidence someone can act on.

    When execution is included in scope and the environment is available, AQA runs the approved checks against the selected flow and captures what passed, failed, blocked, or could not be tested. Failures are investigated before they become noise for engineering, and every conclusion stays tied to available evidence.

    Managed activities
    • Risk-informed execution planning
    • Approved environment and CI execution
    • Failure reproduction and classification
    • Defect, blocker, and uncertainty triage
    Outputs
    • Prioritized execution record
    • Pass, fail, blocked, and not-run evidence
    • Product, test, environment, or data cause classification
    • Actionable defects with reproduction context

    Human controlAI can cluster failures and suggest causes. AQA reproduces the behavior and validates the evidence before calling it a product defect.

    Scoped scopeApplied when justified by the agreed flow

  5. Stage : 5

    Maintain

    Scoped

    Stabilize the signal before the pilot becomes another maintenance burden.

    When maintenance work is included, AQA removes avoidable fragility from the implemented checks and separates stale automation from real regressions. The client receives practical rules for ownership, updates, triage, and future expansion—so Day 14 creates a handover, not a dependency.

    Managed activities
    • Flake and instability investigation
    • Selector, assertion, and test-data hardening
    • Test refactoring and duplication review
    • Ownership and maintenance workflow design
    Outputs
    • Stabilized checks with explained changes
    • Known reliability limits and cause categories
    • Maintenance rules and troubleshooting guidance
    • Prioritized backlog for coverage that remains worth adding

    Human controlNo silent healing. AQA verifies whether the product changed, the test became stale, or a regression occurred before accepting a repair.

    Scoped scopeApplied when justified by the agreed flow

  6. Stage : 6

    Explain

    Core

    End with a decision—not a pile of test activity.

    AQA combines the selected flow, implemented work, execution evidence, known gaps, unresolved blockers, and remaining risk into one clear handover. Stakeholders can see what changed, what was validated, what was not, what they own, and which next move creates the most release confidence.

    Managed activities
    • Evidence and delivered-asset assembly
    • Coverage, gap, and remaining-risk review
    • Ownership and operating-guidance handover
    • Next-decision and priority review
    Outputs
    • Tested and untested scope with linked evidence
    • Delivered assets and client ownership guidance
    • Remaining risks, blockers, exclusions, and assumptions
    • Practical recommendation for the next highest-value action

    Human controlAI can organize the record. AQA leadership owns the interpretation, communicates the uncertainty, and makes the recommendation reviewable.

    Core scopeIncluded in every pilot

14-day delivery path

Implementation starts early and stays tied to evidence.

The sequence adapts to access and product complexity without changing the fixed boundary around one critical flow.

  1. Days 1–2

    Understand

    Map product context, architecture, current quality signals, constraints, and release risk.

  2. Days 3–4

    Design

    Prioritize scenarios and decide which implementation creates the most meaningful 14-day leverage.

  3. Days 5–10

    Build and run

    Implement and execute the agreed QA improvements across the layers justified by the selected flow.

  4. Days 11–12

    Stabilize and integrate

    Harden useful checks, connect evidence to current tools where feasible, and prepare ownership guidance.

  5. Days 13–14

    Explain and hand over

    Review evidence, remaining risk, delivered assets, operating guidance, and the recommended next decision.

What AQA builds

Usable QA assets, not a recommendation deck.

The exact mix follows the selected flow. Every included artifact is handed over with its evidence, ownership, and scope boundary visible.

01Implementation

Working controls inside your delivery stack.

Where the selected flow and access support implementation, AQA creates or hardens useful checks and connects their signal to the way your team already delivers software.

Included artifacts

3 potential implementation outputs

Implemented automated tests

Scope-dependent.

High-value tests created or hardened in the client-approved repository and framework.

Evidence
Execution results and source location are included when access supports implementation.
  • Implemented
  • Buyer-owned
  • Human-reviewed
  • Source-linked

AI QA workflow

Scope-dependent.

A documented, client-approved use of AI for context, scenarios, maintenance, or evidence preparation.

Evidence
Inputs, review point, limitations, and accountable owner are explicit.
  • Implemented
  • Buyer-owned
  • Human-reviewed
  • Source-linked

Pipeline or reporting integration

Scope-dependent.

Useful test signal connected to an existing delivery, reporting, or triage path.

Evidence
Configuration and observed output are included where environment access permits.
  • Implemented
  • Buyer-owned
  • Human-reviewed
  • Source-linked

02Product and risk intelligence

A reviewable model of what deserves protection.

The flow, its failure modes, and the coverage response are made explicit so implementation decisions stay connected to product consequences.

Included artifacts

3 core intelligence outputs

Critical-flow map

Core output.

The selected journey, dependencies, failure points, and business consequences in one reviewable map.

Evidence
Linked to the product context and observed release conditions.
  • Buyer-owned
  • Human-reviewed
  • Source-linked

Risk register

Core output.

Prioritized product and quality risks with likelihood, impact, evidence, and recommended treatment.

Evidence
Each risk cites the available source or observed behavior.
  • Buyer-owned
  • Human-reviewed
  • Source-linked

Test scenarios and coverage model

Core output; depth varies by scope.

Risk-ranked scenarios across the validation layers justified by the selected product flow.

Evidence
Reviewed against the agreed success signal and product intent.
  • Buyer-owned
  • Human-reviewed
  • Source-linked

03Handover and decision

Clear ownership after Day 14.

The delivered work includes practical operating guidance and an evidence-based decision, so the client can keep using the assets without a hidden renewal dependency.

Included artifacts

2 handover outputs

Runbook and ownership guide

Included for implemented assets.

How to run, interpret, maintain, and extend the work after handover.

Evidence
Responsibilities and known constraints are documented.
  • Buyer-owned
  • Human-reviewed
  • Source-linked

Day 14 decision brief

Core output.

Tested areas, remaining risk, delivered work, and a continue, extend, or stop recommendation.

Evidence
Grounded in the pilot evidence rather than borrowed benchmarks.
  • Recommended
  • Buyer-owned
  • Human-reviewed
  • Source-linked

Choose the right engagement

Choose how much QA ownership your team actually needs.

The difference is not team size or a feature list. It is the boundary AQA owns after work begins. Start with focused proof, add missing capability around your team, or hand AQA the recurring delivery layer.

01 / Prove the model

14-Day AI-Augmented QA Pilot

This engagement
Choose when
Choose this when the release problem is real but the right longer-term QA model is not yet proven.
AQA owns
One critical flow, one success signal, and the agreed 14-day implementation and evidence boundary.
Your team keeps
The delivered assets, evidence, remaining-risk record, and the decision to stop, extend, or scale.
Explore the 14-Day AI-Augmented QA Pilot

02 / Strengthen your team

QA Leadership & Enablement

Choose when
Choose this when your existing team remains responsible for delivery but needs architecture, leadership, or specialist technical leverage.
AQA owns
The selected QA Architect, QA Lead, or AI-Augmented QE capability boundary and its agreed outcomes.
Your team keeps
Day-to-day QA delivery, product context, final release authority, and agreed AQA-created assets.
Explore QA leadership

03 / Hand over recurring delivery

Managed QA Delivery

Choose when
Choose this when AQA must operate recurring QA execution, maintenance, regression, and release evidence—not only advise the current team.
AQA owns
The agreed managed QA delivery layer, named responsibilities and capacity, operating cadence, maintenance, and evidence.
Your team keeps
Product and release authority, visibility into the work, and the agreed client-owned delivery assets.
Explore managed delivery

Commercial boundary

One critical flow. Clear boundaries from Day 1.

The pilot aligns the work, responsibilities, and expected outputs before delivery starts so every day moves the selected flow forward.

Agreement at a glance

Duration
14 calendar days
Scope
One agreed business-critical product flow and one success signal
Outcome
Implemented improvements, reviewable evidence, and a clear next decision
Delivery
QA architecture, implementation, execution, and evidence according to the agreed scope
AI
Client-approved model use with human review and accountable QA judgment
Access
NDA and least privilege
Renewal
No automatic renewal

Responsibilities and guardrails

Know what each side owns before the clock starts.

  1. AQA commitment

    Included boundary

    • One named product or engineering owner
    • One 60-minute kickoff and two 30-minute review checkpoints
    • Agreed AQA-created code, configurations, evidence, and runbooks handed over for continued use

  2. Your role

    Client participation

    • Provide scoped access before the delivery clock starts
    • Answer product-intent, environment, and access questions in time for delivery
    • Review evidence and decisions at the agreed checkpoints

  3. Scope guardrails

    Not included by default

    • Whole-product transformation or unlimited testing
    • Equal implementation depth across every testing layer
    • Elimination of release risk or autonomous AI release decisions
    • Transfer of pre-existing AQA materials or third-party ownership rights

Decision value

The handover separates proven protection from remaining risk and makes the next move clear.

Ownership

AQA-created pilot assets are handed over for continued use. Pre-existing AQA and third-party materials keep their existing terms.

Fit filter

Built for a team ready to improve one meaningful release path.

A focused scope creates the room to implement meaningful improvements in 14 days.

Wrong engagement

Not built for

Strong fit

Built for

  1. Unlimited testing or an entire-product transformation

    A meaningful release or quality bottleneck exists

  2. A broad assessment with no implementation path

    One critical flow and success signal can be selected

  3. Delivery without product context, access, or an available owner

    A product or engineering owner can participate

  4. Generic recommendations with no implementation

    Scoped access can be ready before Day 1

  5. Headcount alone without operating-model change

    The team wants implementation, not another assessment

  6. A team unable to act after Day 14

    The team can act on the resulting evidence

Questions before scope

Direct answers about implementation, access, ownership, and Day 14.

The visible answers below are also the source used for structured FAQ data.

Scope and fitDeliveryAI and toolingAccess and securityOwnershipAfter Day 14

It is hands-on implementation inside one agreed critical flow. Analysis identifies the leverage; the team then builds, runs, or integrates the QA improvements that matter most.

Choose the first flow

Find and fix the first gaps before your customers reveal them.

Bring one critical product flow to a 30-minute working session and define the right 14-day scope.

NDA before access Least-privilege scope Every asset stays yours No long-term lock-in
Horia Adamov, QA Architect
Your call host

Horia Adamov

QA Architect

Book a Fit Call